On how justified the term Bijelo Brdo culture is in medieval archaeology
Апстракт
The term "Bijelo Brdo culture" was introduced in the field of archaeology in the 1920s and refers to the archaeological remains from the period of
the formation and rise of the Hungarian state in the Carpathian Basin,
spanning from the 10th to the 12th century. However, this term has sparked a
controversy within medieval archaeology due to conflicting opinions among
experts regarding the interaction between the local post-Avar population and the settled Hungarian groups. In accordance with the specific development of
archaeological science, various interpretative frameworks have been established in Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Croatia and Serbia, often influenced by an ethnocentric approach and primarily based on the interpretation of finds from necropoles. Rather than solely criticizing earlier research practices in these countries, the focus of this paper is to present modern tendencies and provide a fresh perspective on the topics covered by the term "Bijelo Brdo culture."
Кључне речи:
Bijelo Brdo culture / Arpad period / East Central Europe / 10th-12th century / Medieval necropoles / Carpathian BasinИзвор:
6th International Scientific Symposium in honour of Stjepan Gunjača. Political and Social Structures in Early Medieval Central, South and Eastern Europe (9th – 15th centuries): Archaeological and historical evidence, 8 - 11 November 2023, Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments, Split, Croatia, 2023, 30-31Издавач:
- Split : Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments
Институција/група
Археолошки институт / Institute of ArchaeologyTY - CONF AU - Radišić, Milica PY - 2023 UR - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1221 AB - The term "Bijelo Brdo culture" was introduced in the field of archaeology in the 1920s and refers to the archaeological remains from the period of the formation and rise of the Hungarian state in the Carpathian Basin, spanning from the 10th to the 12th century. However, this term has sparked a controversy within medieval archaeology due to conflicting opinions among experts regarding the interaction between the local post-Avar population and the settled Hungarian groups. In accordance with the specific development of archaeological science, various interpretative frameworks have been established in Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Croatia and Serbia, often influenced by an ethnocentric approach and primarily based on the interpretation of finds from necropoles. Rather than solely criticizing earlier research practices in these countries, the focus of this paper is to present modern tendencies and provide a fresh perspective on the topics covered by the term "Bijelo Brdo culture." PB - Split : Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments C3 - 6th International Scientific Symposium in honour of Stjepan Gunjača. Political and Social Structures in Early Medieval Central, South and Eastern Europe (9th – 15th centuries): Archaeological and historical evidence, 8 - 11 November 2023, Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments, Split, Croatia T1 - On how justified the term Bijelo Brdo culture is in medieval archaeology EP - 31 SP - 30 UR - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_1221 ER -
@conference{ author = "Radišić, Milica", year = "2023", abstract = "The term "Bijelo Brdo culture" was introduced in the field of archaeology in the 1920s and refers to the archaeological remains from the period of the formation and rise of the Hungarian state in the Carpathian Basin, spanning from the 10th to the 12th century. However, this term has sparked a controversy within medieval archaeology due to conflicting opinions among experts regarding the interaction between the local post-Avar population and the settled Hungarian groups. In accordance with the specific development of archaeological science, various interpretative frameworks have been established in Hungary, Romania, Slovakia, Croatia and Serbia, often influenced by an ethnocentric approach and primarily based on the interpretation of finds from necropoles. Rather than solely criticizing earlier research practices in these countries, the focus of this paper is to present modern tendencies and provide a fresh perspective on the topics covered by the term "Bijelo Brdo culture."", publisher = "Split : Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments", journal = "6th International Scientific Symposium in honour of Stjepan Gunjača. Political and Social Structures in Early Medieval Central, South and Eastern Europe (9th – 15th centuries): Archaeological and historical evidence, 8 - 11 November 2023, Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments, Split, Croatia", title = "On how justified the term Bijelo Brdo culture is in medieval archaeology", pages = "31-30", url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_1221" }
Radišić, M.. (2023). On how justified the term Bijelo Brdo culture is in medieval archaeology. in 6th International Scientific Symposium in honour of Stjepan Gunjača. Political and Social Structures in Early Medieval Central, South and Eastern Europe (9th – 15th centuries): Archaeological and historical evidence, 8 - 11 November 2023, Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments, Split, Croatia Split : Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments., 30-31. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_1221
Radišić M. On how justified the term Bijelo Brdo culture is in medieval archaeology. in 6th International Scientific Symposium in honour of Stjepan Gunjača. Political and Social Structures in Early Medieval Central, South and Eastern Europe (9th – 15th centuries): Archaeological and historical evidence, 8 - 11 November 2023, Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments, Split, Croatia. 2023;:30-31. https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_1221 .
Radišić, Milica, "On how justified the term Bijelo Brdo culture is in medieval archaeology" in 6th International Scientific Symposium in honour of Stjepan Gunjača. Political and Social Structures in Early Medieval Central, South and Eastern Europe (9th – 15th centuries): Archaeological and historical evidence, 8 - 11 November 2023, Museum of Croatian Archaeological Monuments, Split, Croatia (2023):30-31, https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_1221 .