dc.creator | Vojvoda, Mirjana | |
dc.creator | Crnobrnja, Adam | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-01-22T09:17:45Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-01-22T09:17:45Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | |
dc.identifier.isbn | 978-86-6439-088-0 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/1478 | |
dc.description.abstract | The lack of bronze coins of the senate issues in circulation in the Danubian and Balkan provinces at the start of
the 3rd century was especially pronounced and was probably the main reason for opening the provincial mint in
Viminacium in 239 and subsequently in Dacia in 246. Opening this two mints represented the official way for
temporarily solving the problem in the functioning of the Empire's monetary system. However, it seems that the
two newly founded mints had different roles. As shown by comparative analyses of monetary finds of these two
mints, issues of Viminacium were intended for broader circulation, while issues of the province of Dacia seem
to have been minted solely for the needs of the domicile province | sr |
dc.language.iso | en | sr |
dc.publisher | Beograd : Arheološki institut | sr |
dc.rights | openAccess | sr |
dc.source | Proceedings of the 24th International Congress of Roman Frontier Studies, Limes XXIIII, 2nd - 9th September 2018 Viminacium Belgrade, Serbia. Vol. 1 | sr |
dc.subject | Roman provincial coinage | sr |
dc.subject | Viminacium | sr |
dc.subject | Serbia | sr |
dc.subject | Provincia Dacia | sr |
dc.title | Circulation of „Provincia Dacia“ coinage at the territory of present-day Serbia | sr |
dc.type | bookPart | sr |
dc.rights.license | ARR | sr |
dc.citation.epage | 565 | |
dc.citation.spage | 557 | |
dc.citation.volume | 1 | |
dc.identifier.fulltext | http://rai.ai.ac.rs/bitstream/id/4323/bitstream_4323.pdf | |
dc.identifier.rcub | https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_1478 | |
dc.type.version | publishedVersion | sr |