RAI - Repository of the Institute of Archaeology
Institute of Archaeology, Belgrade
    • English
    • Српски
    • Српски (Serbia)
  • English 
    • English
    • Serbian (Cyrillic)
    • Serbian (Latin)
  • Login
View Item 
  •   RAI
  • Археолошки институт / Institute of Archaeology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
  •   RAI
  • Археолошки институт / Institute of Archaeology
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Neolitsko zemljoradničko oruđe i njegov značaj u počecima poljoprivrede na tlu Srbije

Neolithic agricultural tools and its significance in the beginning of farming in the territory of Serbia

Thumbnail
2005
64.pdf (412.4Kb)
Authors
Antonović, Dragana
Article (Published version)
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Ustaljivanje zemljoradnje i stočarstva na evropskom tlu vezuje se za proces neolitizacije. Po svim dosadašnjim proučavanjima, neolitizacija i neolit predstavljaju import koji je dospeo na evropski kontinent putem nekoliko mogućih mehanizama difuzije: migracijom, kolonizacijom u manjim grupama infiltracijom, postupnim osvajanjem pograničnih teritorija i kontaktima radi razmene (Zvelebil 2001). Sasvim je moguće da se na evropskom tlu odvijao proces paralelan sa neolitizacijom na bliskom i srednjem istoku, a koji možemo nazvati mezolitizacijom. Neolitizacija je u ovom našem delu sveta proces specifičan za bliski i srednji istok, a karakterišu ga sedelački život i stalna naselja, uzgajanje žitarica i domestifikacija određenih vrsta životinja, pre svega ovce i koze. Taj proces započinje pre uvođenja keramike kao tehnološke inovacije u svakodnevni život (prekeramički neolit). Istovremeno na evropskom tlu odvija se poseban globalni proces (mezolitizacija) kao prirodni odgovor evropskog kontin...enta na promenu klime nastalu u postglacijalnom periodu. U tom procesu evropsko tlo, u kulturnom smislu, postaje jedinstveno. Stvaraju se stalna staništa kao rezultat izobilja hrane na jednom mestu zbog povoljnijih klimatskih uslova. Sa stalnim staništima povezana je pojava formalnih prostora za sahranu kako u naselju tako i odvojenih organizovanih nekropola van areala staništa. Ustaljuje se običaj posipanja pokojnika okerom i prilaganje oruđa-oružja i nakita u grobove. U industriji okresanog kamena dolazi do mikrolitizacije oruđa, a to znači da postaje povećana upotreba luka i strela - lakog oružja za brži lov. Ishrana se dosta oslanja na akvatične resurse, pa su mnogo više zastupljeni ribolov i sakupljanje školjki i puževa. Pripitomljava se pas. Pojavljuje se glačano oruđe za sečenje drveća, ali ne radi stvaranja oranica, već za drvo kao građu.

Neolithic agricultural tools (hoes, axes, hammer axes, pickaxe, plowshares planters, saws, trashing tools, millstones and rubbers) have been found in small quantity at the sites in our country and hence it is very difficult to discuss this type of tools and the level of agriculture in the Neolithic economy. There are many possible reasons for such small amount of these tools but two most probable keep coming to our mind: one is that such tools had been left in the fields and never had been brought into the settlement and other that this type of tools had been mostly made of wood. This could explain the fact that there are so few tools, which could be related to agriculture at our Neolithic sites and so many tools revealing the traces of use resulting from woodworking. Wood, considering that it is more flexible than stone, bone and antler proved to be more suitable material for production of tools used in agriculture as it is suggested by some experimental testing (Krasnov 1971: 2123). ...Therefore we think that it is utterly wrong to associate large number of stone tools with cutting edge discovered at our Neolithic sites with primary Neolithic agriculture. In favor of this speaks the fact that most of these tools reveal the traces of use resulting from woodworking. More comprehensive investigation of the beginnings of agriculture in this territory is of utmost importance just because these areas were among the first after Greece and Bulgaria on the path of influence (or colonization) by the bearers of Neolithic progress from the Near East and Anatolia. One of rather important links in that investigation are the very tools of stone, bone and antler as objects, which could illustrate the prehistoric economy and which had been so far neglected as less attractive objects in the museum collections and as inferior chronological indicators.

Source:
Zbornik Narodnog muzeja - serija: Arheologija, 2005, 18, 1, 47-67
Publisher:
  • Narodni muzej, Beograd

ISSN: 0352-2474

[ Google Scholar ]
URI
http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/67
Collections
  • Radovi istraživača / Researchers’ publications
Institution/Community
Археолошки институт / Institute of Archaeology
TY  - JOUR
AU  - Antonović, Dragana
PY  - 2005
UR  - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/67
AB  - Ustaljivanje zemljoradnje i stočarstva na evropskom tlu vezuje se za proces neolitizacije. Po svim dosadašnjim proučavanjima, neolitizacija i neolit predstavljaju import koji je dospeo na evropski kontinent putem nekoliko mogućih mehanizama difuzije: migracijom, kolonizacijom u manjim grupama infiltracijom, postupnim osvajanjem pograničnih teritorija i kontaktima radi razmene (Zvelebil 2001). Sasvim je moguće da se na evropskom tlu odvijao proces paralelan sa neolitizacijom na bliskom i srednjem istoku, a koji možemo nazvati mezolitizacijom. Neolitizacija je u ovom našem delu sveta proces specifičan za bliski i srednji istok, a karakterišu ga sedelački život i stalna naselja, uzgajanje žitarica i domestifikacija određenih vrsta životinja, pre svega ovce i koze. Taj proces započinje pre uvođenja keramike kao tehnološke inovacije u svakodnevni život (prekeramički neolit). Istovremeno na evropskom tlu odvija se poseban globalni proces (mezolitizacija) kao prirodni odgovor evropskog kontinenta na promenu klime nastalu u postglacijalnom periodu. U tom procesu evropsko tlo, u kulturnom smislu, postaje jedinstveno. Stvaraju se stalna staništa kao rezultat izobilja hrane na jednom mestu zbog povoljnijih klimatskih uslova. Sa stalnim staništima povezana je pojava formalnih prostora za sahranu kako u naselju tako i odvojenih organizovanih nekropola van areala staništa. Ustaljuje se običaj posipanja pokojnika okerom i prilaganje oruđa-oružja i nakita u grobove. U industriji okresanog kamena dolazi do mikrolitizacije oruđa, a to znači da postaje povećana upotreba luka i strela - lakog oružja za brži lov. Ishrana se dosta oslanja na akvatične resurse, pa su mnogo više zastupljeni ribolov i sakupljanje školjki i puževa. Pripitomljava se pas. Pojavljuje se glačano oruđe za sečenje drveća, ali ne radi stvaranja oranica, već za drvo kao građu.
AB  - Neolithic agricultural tools (hoes, axes, hammer axes, pickaxe, plowshares planters, saws, trashing tools, millstones and rubbers) have been found in small quantity at the sites in our country and hence it is very difficult to discuss this type of tools and the level of agriculture in the Neolithic economy. There are many possible reasons for such small amount of these tools but two most probable keep coming to our mind: one is that such tools had been left in the fields and never had been brought into the settlement and other that this type of tools had been mostly made of wood. This could explain the fact that there are so few tools, which could be related to agriculture at our Neolithic sites and so many tools revealing the traces of use resulting from woodworking. Wood, considering that it is more flexible than stone, bone and antler proved to be more suitable material for production of tools used in agriculture as it is suggested by some experimental testing (Krasnov 1971: 2123). Therefore we think that it is utterly wrong to associate large number of stone tools with cutting edge discovered at our Neolithic sites with primary Neolithic agriculture. In favor of this speaks the fact that most of these tools reveal the traces of use resulting from woodworking. More comprehensive investigation of the beginnings of agriculture in this territory is of utmost importance just because these areas were among the first after Greece and Bulgaria on the path of influence (or colonization) by the bearers of Neolithic progress from the Near East and Anatolia. One of rather important links in that investigation are the very tools of stone, bone and antler as objects, which could illustrate the prehistoric economy and which had been so far neglected as less attractive objects in the museum collections and as inferior chronological indicators.
PB  - Narodni muzej, Beograd
T2  - Zbornik Narodnog muzeja - serija: Arheologija
T1  - Neolitsko zemljoradničko oruđe i njegov značaj u počecima poljoprivrede na tlu Srbije
T1  - Neolithic agricultural tools and its significance in the beginning of farming in the territory of Serbia
EP  - 67
IS  - 1
SP  - 47
VL  - 18
UR  - conv_181
ER  - 
@article{
author = "Antonović, Dragana",
year = "2005",
abstract = "Ustaljivanje zemljoradnje i stočarstva na evropskom tlu vezuje se za proces neolitizacije. Po svim dosadašnjim proučavanjima, neolitizacija i neolit predstavljaju import koji je dospeo na evropski kontinent putem nekoliko mogućih mehanizama difuzije: migracijom, kolonizacijom u manjim grupama infiltracijom, postupnim osvajanjem pograničnih teritorija i kontaktima radi razmene (Zvelebil 2001). Sasvim je moguće da se na evropskom tlu odvijao proces paralelan sa neolitizacijom na bliskom i srednjem istoku, a koji možemo nazvati mezolitizacijom. Neolitizacija je u ovom našem delu sveta proces specifičan za bliski i srednji istok, a karakterišu ga sedelački život i stalna naselja, uzgajanje žitarica i domestifikacija određenih vrsta životinja, pre svega ovce i koze. Taj proces započinje pre uvođenja keramike kao tehnološke inovacije u svakodnevni život (prekeramički neolit). Istovremeno na evropskom tlu odvija se poseban globalni proces (mezolitizacija) kao prirodni odgovor evropskog kontinenta na promenu klime nastalu u postglacijalnom periodu. U tom procesu evropsko tlo, u kulturnom smislu, postaje jedinstveno. Stvaraju se stalna staništa kao rezultat izobilja hrane na jednom mestu zbog povoljnijih klimatskih uslova. Sa stalnim staništima povezana je pojava formalnih prostora za sahranu kako u naselju tako i odvojenih organizovanih nekropola van areala staništa. Ustaljuje se običaj posipanja pokojnika okerom i prilaganje oruđa-oružja i nakita u grobove. U industriji okresanog kamena dolazi do mikrolitizacije oruđa, a to znači da postaje povećana upotreba luka i strela - lakog oružja za brži lov. Ishrana se dosta oslanja na akvatične resurse, pa su mnogo više zastupljeni ribolov i sakupljanje školjki i puževa. Pripitomljava se pas. Pojavljuje se glačano oruđe za sečenje drveća, ali ne radi stvaranja oranica, već za drvo kao građu., Neolithic agricultural tools (hoes, axes, hammer axes, pickaxe, plowshares planters, saws, trashing tools, millstones and rubbers) have been found in small quantity at the sites in our country and hence it is very difficult to discuss this type of tools and the level of agriculture in the Neolithic economy. There are many possible reasons for such small amount of these tools but two most probable keep coming to our mind: one is that such tools had been left in the fields and never had been brought into the settlement and other that this type of tools had been mostly made of wood. This could explain the fact that there are so few tools, which could be related to agriculture at our Neolithic sites and so many tools revealing the traces of use resulting from woodworking. Wood, considering that it is more flexible than stone, bone and antler proved to be more suitable material for production of tools used in agriculture as it is suggested by some experimental testing (Krasnov 1971: 2123). Therefore we think that it is utterly wrong to associate large number of stone tools with cutting edge discovered at our Neolithic sites with primary Neolithic agriculture. In favor of this speaks the fact that most of these tools reveal the traces of use resulting from woodworking. More comprehensive investigation of the beginnings of agriculture in this territory is of utmost importance just because these areas were among the first after Greece and Bulgaria on the path of influence (or colonization) by the bearers of Neolithic progress from the Near East and Anatolia. One of rather important links in that investigation are the very tools of stone, bone and antler as objects, which could illustrate the prehistoric economy and which had been so far neglected as less attractive objects in the museum collections and as inferior chronological indicators.",
publisher = "Narodni muzej, Beograd",
journal = "Zbornik Narodnog muzeja - serija: Arheologija",
title = "Neolitsko zemljoradničko oruđe i njegov značaj u počecima poljoprivrede na tlu Srbije, Neolithic agricultural tools and its significance in the beginning of farming in the territory of Serbia",
pages = "67-47",
number = "1",
volume = "18",
url = "conv_181"
}
Antonović, D.. (2005). Neolitsko zemljoradničko oruđe i njegov značaj u počecima poljoprivrede na tlu Srbije. in Zbornik Narodnog muzeja - serija: Arheologija
Narodni muzej, Beograd., 18(1), 47-67.
conv_181
Antonović D. Neolitsko zemljoradničko oruđe i njegov značaj u počecima poljoprivrede na tlu Srbije. in Zbornik Narodnog muzeja - serija: Arheologija. 2005;18(1):47-67.
conv_181 .
Antonović, Dragana, "Neolitsko zemljoradničko oruđe i njegov značaj u počecima poljoprivrede na tlu Srbije" in Zbornik Narodnog muzeja - serija: Arheologija, 18, no. 1 (2005):47-67,
conv_181 .

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB
 

 

All of DSpaceInstitutions/communitiesAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis institutionAuthorsTitlesSubjects

Statistics

View Usage Statistics

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2015  DuraSpace
About RAI | Send Feedback

OpenAIRERCUB