TY  - JOUR
AU  - Filipović, Dragana
AU  - Jones, Glynis
AU  - Kirleis, Wiebke
AU  - Bogaard, Amy
AU  - Ballantyne, Rachel
AU  - Charles, Michael
AU  - de Vareilles, Anne
AU  - Ergun, Müge
AU  - Gkatzogia, Eugenia
AU  - Holguin, Amy
AU  - Hristova, Ivanka
AU  - Karathanou, Angeliki
AU  - Kapcia, Magda
AU  - Knežić, Dolores
AU  - Kotzamani, Georgia
AU  - Lathiras, Pavlos
AU  - Livarda, Alexandra
AU  - Marinova, Elena
AU  - Michou, Stavroula
AU  - Mosulishvili, Marine
AU  - Mueller-Bieniek, Aldona
AU  - Obradović, Djurdja
AU  - Padgett, Matthew
AU  - Paraskevopoulou, Pelagia
AU  - Petridou, Chryssi
AU  - Stylianakou, Haroula
AU  - Zerl, Tanja
AU  - Vidas, Doris
AU  - Valamoti, Soultana Maria
PY  - 2023
UR  - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/934
AB  - Triticum timopheevii sensu lato (‘new glume wheat’, NGW) was first recognised as a distinct prehistoric cereal crop through work on archaeobotanical finds from Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in northern Greece. This was later followed by its identification in archaeobotanical assemblages from other parts of Europe. This paper provides an overview of the currently known archaeobotanical finds of Timopheev’s wheat in southeastern and eastern Europe and observes their temporal span and spatial distribution. To date, there are 89 prehistoric sites with these finds, located in different parts of the study region and dated from the Neolithic to the very late Iron Age. Their latest recorded presence in the region is in the last centuries BCE. For assemblages from the site as a whole containing at least 30 grain and/or chaff remains of Timopheev’s wheat, we take a brief look at the overall relative proportions of Triticum monococcum (einkorn), T. dicoccum (emmer) and T. timopheevii s.l. (Timopheev’s wheat), the three most common glume wheats in our study region in prehistory. We highlight several sites where the overall proportions of Timopheev’s wheat might be taken to suggest it was a minor component of a mixed crop (maslin), or an unmonitored inclusion in einkorn or emmer fields. At the same sites, however, there are also discrete contexts where this wheat is strongly predominant, pointing to its cultivation as a pure crop. We therefore emphasise the need to evaluate the relative representation of Timopheev’s wheat at the level of individual samples or contexts before making inferences on its cultivation status. We also encourage re-examination of prehistoric and historic cereal assemblages for its remains.
PB  - Springer Nature
T2  - Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
T1  - Triticum timopheevii s.l. (‘new glume wheat’) finds in regions of southern and eastern Europe across space and time
DO  - 10.1007/s00334-023-00954-w
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Filipović, Dragana and Jones, Glynis and Kirleis, Wiebke and Bogaard, Amy and Ballantyne, Rachel and Charles, Michael and de Vareilles, Anne and Ergun, Müge and Gkatzogia, Eugenia and Holguin, Amy and Hristova, Ivanka and Karathanou, Angeliki and Kapcia, Magda and Knežić, Dolores and Kotzamani, Georgia and Lathiras, Pavlos and Livarda, Alexandra and Marinova, Elena and Michou, Stavroula and Mosulishvili, Marine and Mueller-Bieniek, Aldona and Obradović, Djurdja and Padgett, Matthew and Paraskevopoulou, Pelagia and Petridou, Chryssi and Stylianakou, Haroula and Zerl, Tanja and Vidas, Doris and Valamoti, Soultana Maria",
year = "2023",
abstract = "Triticum timopheevii sensu lato (‘new glume wheat’, NGW) was first recognised as a distinct prehistoric cereal crop through work on archaeobotanical finds from Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in northern Greece. This was later followed by its identification in archaeobotanical assemblages from other parts of Europe. This paper provides an overview of the currently known archaeobotanical finds of Timopheev’s wheat in southeastern and eastern Europe and observes their temporal span and spatial distribution. To date, there are 89 prehistoric sites with these finds, located in different parts of the study region and dated from the Neolithic to the very late Iron Age. Their latest recorded presence in the region is in the last centuries BCE. For assemblages from the site as a whole containing at least 30 grain and/or chaff remains of Timopheev’s wheat, we take a brief look at the overall relative proportions of Triticum monococcum (einkorn), T. dicoccum (emmer) and T. timopheevii s.l. (Timopheev’s wheat), the three most common glume wheats in our study region in prehistory. We highlight several sites where the overall proportions of Timopheev’s wheat might be taken to suggest it was a minor component of a mixed crop (maslin), or an unmonitored inclusion in einkorn or emmer fields. At the same sites, however, there are also discrete contexts where this wheat is strongly predominant, pointing to its cultivation as a pure crop. We therefore emphasise the need to evaluate the relative representation of Timopheev’s wheat at the level of individual samples or contexts before making inferences on its cultivation status. We also encourage re-examination of prehistoric and historic cereal assemblages for its remains.",
publisher = "Springer Nature",
journal = "Vegetation History and Archaeobotany",
title = "Triticum timopheevii s.l. (‘new glume wheat’) finds in regions of southern and eastern Europe across space and time",
doi = "10.1007/s00334-023-00954-w"
}

Filipović, D., Jones, G., Kirleis, W., Bogaard, A., Ballantyne, R., Charles, M., de Vareilles, A., Ergun, M., Gkatzogia, E., Holguin, A., Hristova, I., Karathanou, A., Kapcia, M., Knežić, D., Kotzamani, G., Lathiras, P., Livarda, A., Marinova, E., Michou, S., Mosulishvili, M., Mueller-Bieniek, A., Obradović, D., Padgett, M., Paraskevopoulou, P., Petridou, C., Stylianakou, H., Zerl, T., Vidas, D.,& Valamoti, S. M.. (2023). Triticum timopheevii s.l. (‘new glume wheat’) finds in regions of southern and eastern Europe across space and time. in Vegetation History and Archaeobotany
Springer Nature..
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00954-w

Filipović D, Jones G, Kirleis W, Bogaard A, Ballantyne R, Charles M, de Vareilles A, Ergun M, Gkatzogia E, Holguin A, Hristova I, Karathanou A, Kapcia M, Knežić D, Kotzamani G, Lathiras P, Livarda A, Marinova E, Michou S, Mosulishvili M, Mueller-Bieniek A, Obradović D, Padgett M, Paraskevopoulou P, Petridou C, Stylianakou H, Zerl T, Vidas D, Valamoti SM. Triticum timopheevii s.l. (‘new glume wheat’) finds in regions of southern and eastern Europe across space and time. in Vegetation History and Archaeobotany. 2023;.
doi:10.1007/s00334-023-00954-w .

Filipović, Dragana, Jones, Glynis, Kirleis, Wiebke, Bogaard, Amy, Ballantyne, Rachel, Charles, Michael, de Vareilles, Anne, Ergun, Müge, Gkatzogia, Eugenia, Holguin, Amy, Hristova, Ivanka, Karathanou, Angeliki, Kapcia, Magda, Knežić, Dolores, Kotzamani, Georgia, Lathiras, Pavlos, Livarda, Alexandra, Marinova, Elena, Michou, Stavroula, Mosulishvili, Marine, Mueller-Bieniek, Aldona, Obradović, Djurdja, Padgett, Matthew, Paraskevopoulou, Pelagia, Petridou, Chryssi, Stylianakou, Haroula, Zerl, Tanja, Vidas, Doris, Valamoti, Soultana Maria, "Triticum timopheevii s.l. (‘new glume wheat’) finds in regions of southern and eastern Europe across space and time" in Vegetation History and Archaeobotany (2023),
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00954-w . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Marinova, Elena
AU  - Filipović, Dragana
AU  - Obradović, Đurđa
AU  - Allué, Ethel
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/602
AB  - Das archäobotanische Material (Samen/Früchte und Holzkohle) von einem mesolithischen und
mehreren frühneolithischen Fundplätzen in Südosteuropa im Einzugsbereich der mittleren Donau
wird vorgestellt und mit dem aus der Region vorliegenden archäobotanischen und paläo­ökologischen
Material verglichen. Die Taxa der Makroreste werden als Hinweis auf Landnutzung und Verwertung
476
von Wildplanzen sowie als indirekter Beleg der um
die Fundplätze vorherrschenden Vegetation gewertet.
Die Ma kroreste umfassen hauptsächlich sich gut erhaltende planzenteile – zum Beispiel Obstkerne und
Nussschalen – und zeigen an, dass als häuigste Arten
Kornelkirsche (Cornus mas), Hasel (Corylus avellana)
und Holunder (Sambucus sp.) gesammelt wurden.
Die Holzkohlenfunde lassen vermuten, dass die
mesolithische und frühneolithische Bevölkerung offenen Wald und Waldsteppe nutzte sowie Eichenwälder und die Ufervegetation von Gewässern. Die
Zusammensetzung der Proben von verschiedenen
Plätzen deutet auf eine allgemeine Kontinuität in
der Nutzung gleichartiger Wildplanzen und Landschaten im Arbeitsgebiet während der untersuchten
Zeitspanne hin (7500–5500 cal BC).
T2  - Offa. Berichte und Mitteilungen zur Urgeschichte, Frühgeschichte und Mittelalterarchäologie
T1  - Wild Plant Resources and Land Use in Mesolithic and Early Neolithic South-­East Europe. Archaeobotanical Evidence from the Danube Catchment of Bulgaria and Serbia
EP  - 478
SP  - 467
VL  - 69/70
UR  - https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_602
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Marinova, Elena and Filipović, Dragana and Obradović, Đurđa and Allué, Ethel",
year = "2013",
abstract = "Das archäobotanische Material (Samen/Früchte und Holzkohle) von einem mesolithischen und
mehreren frühneolithischen Fundplätzen in Südosteuropa im Einzugsbereich der mittleren Donau
wird vorgestellt und mit dem aus der Region vorliegenden archäobotanischen und paläo­ökologischen
Material verglichen. Die Taxa der Makroreste werden als Hinweis auf Landnutzung und Verwertung
476
von Wildplanzen sowie als indirekter Beleg der um
die Fundplätze vorherrschenden Vegetation gewertet.
Die Ma kroreste umfassen hauptsächlich sich gut erhaltende planzenteile – zum Beispiel Obstkerne und
Nussschalen – und zeigen an, dass als häuigste Arten
Kornelkirsche (Cornus mas), Hasel (Corylus avellana)
und Holunder (Sambucus sp.) gesammelt wurden.
Die Holzkohlenfunde lassen vermuten, dass die
mesolithische und frühneolithische Bevölkerung offenen Wald und Waldsteppe nutzte sowie Eichenwälder und die Ufervegetation von Gewässern. Die
Zusammensetzung der Proben von verschiedenen
Plätzen deutet auf eine allgemeine Kontinuität in
der Nutzung gleichartiger Wildplanzen und Landschaten im Arbeitsgebiet während der untersuchten
Zeitspanne hin (7500–5500 cal BC).",
journal = "Offa. Berichte und Mitteilungen zur Urgeschichte, Frühgeschichte und Mittelalterarchäologie",
title = "Wild Plant Resources and Land Use in Mesolithic and Early Neolithic South-­East Europe. Archaeobotanical Evidence from the Danube Catchment of Bulgaria and Serbia",
pages = "478-467",
volume = "69/70",
url = "https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_602"
}

Marinova, E., Filipović, D., Obradović, Đ.,& Allué, E.. (2013). Wild Plant Resources and Land Use in Mesolithic and Early Neolithic South-­East Europe. Archaeobotanical Evidence from the Danube Catchment of Bulgaria and Serbia. in Offa. Berichte und Mitteilungen zur Urgeschichte, Frühgeschichte und Mittelalterarchäologie, 69/70, 467-478.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_602

Marinova E, Filipović D, Obradović Đ, Allué E. Wild Plant Resources and Land Use in Mesolithic and Early Neolithic South-­East Europe. Archaeobotanical Evidence from the Danube Catchment of Bulgaria and Serbia. in Offa. Berichte und Mitteilungen zur Urgeschichte, Frühgeschichte und Mittelalterarchäologie. 2013;69/70:467-478.
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_602 .

Marinova, Elena, Filipović, Dragana, Obradović, Đurđa, Allué, Ethel, "Wild Plant Resources and Land Use in Mesolithic and Early Neolithic South-­East Europe. Archaeobotanical Evidence from the Danube Catchment of Bulgaria and Serbia" in Offa. Berichte und Mitteilungen zur Urgeschichte, Frühgeschichte und Mittelalterarchäologie, 69/70 (2013):467-478,
https://hdl.handle.net/21.15107/rcub_rai_602 .