TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ignjatović, Suzana
AU  - Bošković, Aleksandar
PY  - 2018
UR  - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/278
AB  - The paper deals with methodological individualism in sociocultural anthropology. Key theories and debates within the framework of methodological individualism in anthropology are presented in the paper. The authors discuss criticisms aimed at the use of methodological individualism in anthropology as not suitable for anthropology, due to its specificity. Instead, they argue that methodological individualism has advantages for a better understanding of many anthropological topics, especially compared to methodological holism. The authors' assumption is that anthropology is not exclusively a holistic science, as the history of anthropological theory points to an important tradition of methodological individualism. The focus is placed on alternative models of scientific explanation, found in the works of contemporary anthropologists (Holy, Stuchlik), as well as methodological individualists from other disciplines (Boudon), whose conclusions are applicable to anthropology. Methodological individualism does have a significant place in anthropology. There are areas of anthropology that can draw heuristic benefit from epistemological approaches based on the principles of methodological individualism.
PB  - Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd
T2  - Etnoantropološki problemi, Beograd
T1  - Constructing a scientific explanation in anthropology on the principles of methodological individualism
EP  - 40
IS  - 1
SP  - 17
VL  - 13
DO  - 10.21301/eap.v13i1.1
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ignjatović, Suzana and Bošković, Aleksandar",
year = "2018",
abstract = "The paper deals with methodological individualism in sociocultural anthropology. Key theories and debates within the framework of methodological individualism in anthropology are presented in the paper. The authors discuss criticisms aimed at the use of methodological individualism in anthropology as not suitable for anthropology, due to its specificity. Instead, they argue that methodological individualism has advantages for a better understanding of many anthropological topics, especially compared to methodological holism. The authors' assumption is that anthropology is not exclusively a holistic science, as the history of anthropological theory points to an important tradition of methodological individualism. The focus is placed on alternative models of scientific explanation, found in the works of contemporary anthropologists (Holy, Stuchlik), as well as methodological individualists from other disciplines (Boudon), whose conclusions are applicable to anthropology. Methodological individualism does have a significant place in anthropology. There are areas of anthropology that can draw heuristic benefit from epistemological approaches based on the principles of methodological individualism.",
publisher = "Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd",
journal = "Etnoantropološki problemi, Beograd",
title = "Constructing a scientific explanation in anthropology on the principles of methodological individualism",
pages = "40-17",
number = "1",
volume = "13",
doi = "10.21301/eap.v13i1.1"
}

Ignjatović, S.,& Bošković, A.. (2018). Constructing a scientific explanation in anthropology on the principles of methodological individualism. in Etnoantropološki problemi, Beograd
Univerzitet u Beogradu - Filozofski fakultet - Odeljenje za etnologiju i antropologiju, Beograd., 13(1), 17-40.
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i1.1

Ignjatović S, Bošković A. Constructing a scientific explanation in anthropology on the principles of methodological individualism. in Etnoantropološki problemi, Beograd. 2018;13(1):17-40.
doi:10.21301/eap.v13i1.1 .

Ignjatović, Suzana, Bošković, Aleksandar, "Constructing a scientific explanation in anthropology on the principles of methodological individualism" in Etnoantropološki problemi, Beograd, 13, no. 1 (2018):17-40,
https://doi.org/10.21301/eap.v13i1.1 . .

TY  - CHAP
AU  - Ignjatović, Suzana
AU  - Bošković, Aleksandar
PY  - 2017
UR  - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/261
PB  - Taylor and Francis Inc.
T2  - Gender Equality in a Global Perspective
T1  - Gender equality in Serbia
EP  - 223
SP  - 198
DO  - 10.4324/9781315639505
ER  - 

@inbook{
author = "Ignjatović, Suzana and Bošković, Aleksandar",
year = "2017",
publisher = "Taylor and Francis Inc.",
journal = "Gender Equality in a Global Perspective",
booktitle = "Gender equality in Serbia",
pages = "223-198",
doi = "10.4324/9781315639505"
}

Ignjatović, S.,& Bošković, A.. (2017). Gender equality in Serbia. in Gender Equality in a Global Perspective
Taylor and Francis Inc.., 198-223.
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639505

Ignjatović S, Bošković A. Gender equality in Serbia. in Gender Equality in a Global Perspective. 2017;:198-223.
doi:10.4324/9781315639505 .

Ignjatović, Suzana, Bošković, Aleksandar, "Gender equality in Serbia" in Gender Equality in a Global Perspective (2017):198-223,
https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315639505 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Ignjatović, Suzana
AU  - Bošković, Aleksandar
PY  - 2013
UR  - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/176
AB  - This article explores three dimensions of the current state of gender equality in Serbia: public policy on gender equality, public opinion on gender equality and the context of Serbia's accession to the EU. Using data from the recent (2010) public opinion survey of citizens' attitudes towards gender equality, the authors address the following issues: (1) harmonization of public policy on gender equality in Serbia with EU policies; (2) differences between public policy on gender equality in Serbia and citizens' preferences; (3) convergences/divergences between citizens of Serbia and EU citizens regarding gender equality. As Serbia's policy of promoting gender equality in the last decade has been dominated by the political goal of accession to the EU, it shows where the opinions converge (violence against women is seen as a priority), and where there are certain differences (intervention in gender equality issues). The authors show the complexity of ideological positions among average Serbian citizens, while highlighting different (and sometimes contradictory) paradigms in the official public policy on gender equality. While Serbian citizens still do not place gender equality high on their political agenda, they are convinced that it has a certain value, which does provide some important pointers for the future.
PB  - Sage Publications Ltd, London
T2  - European Journal of Womens Studies
T1  - 'Are we there yet?' Citizens of Serbia and public policy on gender equality within the EU accession context
EP  - 440
IS  - 4
SP  - 425
VL  - 20
DO  - 10.1177/1350506813478409
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Ignjatović, Suzana and Bošković, Aleksandar",
year = "2013",
abstract = "This article explores three dimensions of the current state of gender equality in Serbia: public policy on gender equality, public opinion on gender equality and the context of Serbia's accession to the EU. Using data from the recent (2010) public opinion survey of citizens' attitudes towards gender equality, the authors address the following issues: (1) harmonization of public policy on gender equality in Serbia with EU policies; (2) differences between public policy on gender equality in Serbia and citizens' preferences; (3) convergences/divergences between citizens of Serbia and EU citizens regarding gender equality. As Serbia's policy of promoting gender equality in the last decade has been dominated by the political goal of accession to the EU, it shows where the opinions converge (violence against women is seen as a priority), and where there are certain differences (intervention in gender equality issues). The authors show the complexity of ideological positions among average Serbian citizens, while highlighting different (and sometimes contradictory) paradigms in the official public policy on gender equality. While Serbian citizens still do not place gender equality high on their political agenda, they are convinced that it has a certain value, which does provide some important pointers for the future.",
publisher = "Sage Publications Ltd, London",
journal = "European Journal of Womens Studies",
title = "'Are we there yet?' Citizens of Serbia and public policy on gender equality within the EU accession context",
pages = "440-425",
number = "4",
volume = "20",
doi = "10.1177/1350506813478409"
}

Ignjatović, S.,& Bošković, A.. (2013). 'Are we there yet?' Citizens of Serbia and public policy on gender equality within the EU accession context. in European Journal of Womens Studies
Sage Publications Ltd, London., 20(4), 425-440.
https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506813478409

Ignjatović S, Bošković A. 'Are we there yet?' Citizens of Serbia and public policy on gender equality within the EU accession context. in European Journal of Womens Studies. 2013;20(4):425-440.
doi:10.1177/1350506813478409 .

Ignjatović, Suzana, Bošković, Aleksandar, "'Are we there yet?' Citizens of Serbia and public policy on gender equality within the EU accession context" in European Journal of Womens Studies, 20, no. 4 (2013):425-440,
https://doi.org/10.1177/1350506813478409 . .

TY  - JOUR
AU  - Bošković, Aleksandar
AU  - Ignjatović, Suzana
PY  - 2012
UR  - http://rai.ai.ac.rs/handle/123456789/171
PB  - Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon
T2  - Ethnos
T1  - Understanding Ethnic Conflicts through Rational Choice: A Review Article
EP  - 296
IS  - 2
SP  - 290
VL  - 77
DO  - 10.1080/00141844.2011.644314
ER  - 

@article{
author = "Bošković, Aleksandar and Ignjatović, Suzana",
year = "2012",
publisher = "Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon",
journal = "Ethnos",
title = "Understanding Ethnic Conflicts through Rational Choice: A Review Article",
pages = "296-290",
number = "2",
volume = "77",
doi = "10.1080/00141844.2011.644314"
}

Bošković, A.,& Ignjatović, S.. (2012). Understanding Ethnic Conflicts through Rational Choice: A Review Article. in Ethnos
Routledge Journals, Taylor & Francis Ltd, Abingdon., 77(2), 290-296.
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2011.644314

Bošković A, Ignjatović S. Understanding Ethnic Conflicts through Rational Choice: A Review Article. in Ethnos. 2012;77(2):290-296.
doi:10.1080/00141844.2011.644314 .

Bošković, Aleksandar, Ignjatović, Suzana, "Understanding Ethnic Conflicts through Rational Choice: A Review Article" in Ethnos, 77, no. 2 (2012):290-296,
https://doi.org/10.1080/00141844.2011.644314 . .